<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tweet, Tweet… when does the Twitter-ing cease?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.strategicblend.com/tweet-tweet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.strategicblend.com/tweet-tweet/</link>
	<description>an interactive firm specializing in online advertising, community development, brand identity, website design and production</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 21:11:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shay</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicblend.com/tweet-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Shay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicblend.com/?p=870#comment-45</guid>
		<description>I jumped on the Twitter bandwagon early, and then a few months ago, I opted out. The best thing about Twitter (for me) was that it made the sound of a bird chirping every time I opened the app on my iPhone. Beyond that, it seemed silly &amp; pointless. How much can I really say with only 160 characters? And how would I make my &quot;tweets&quot; different from what I post as a &quot;status update&quot; on Facebook? Most of the people on there posted about how drunk they were, or began a tweet with the word &quot;totally&quot; (&quot;Totally listening to Britney Spears with the windows down!&quot; &quot;Totally D-RUNK at the club tonight!!!1111&quot;) That&#039;s not exactly compelling information, but then again I&#039;m old for Twitter (26).

I don&#039;t think the future of Twitter looks too bright simply because there&#039;s only one feature- and its a feature you can do on Facebook or MySpace, so what&#039;s the point? They&#039;re going to have to come up with some newer, more shiny ways to &quot;micro-blog&quot; if they want to stay relevant. The social networking world moves quick, and most folks get bored fast. Hopefully they are planning some new stuff. Otherwise I&#039;m afraid they will be retired to the &quot;hey- remember TWITTER?&quot; category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I jumped on the Twitter bandwagon early, and then a few months ago, I opted out. The best thing about Twitter (for me) was that it made the sound of a bird chirping every time I opened the app on my iPhone. Beyond that, it seemed silly &amp; pointless. How much can I really say with only 160 characters? And how would I make my &#8220;tweets&#8221; different from what I post as a &#8220;status update&#8221; on Facebook? Most of the people on there posted about how drunk they were, or began a tweet with the word &#8220;totally&#8221; (&#8220;Totally listening to Britney Spears with the windows down!&#8221; &#8220;Totally D-RUNK at the club tonight!!!1111&#8243;) That&#8217;s not exactly compelling information, but then again I&#8217;m old for Twitter (26).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the future of Twitter looks too bright simply because there&#8217;s only one feature- and its a feature you can do on Facebook or MySpace, so what&#8217;s the point? They&#8217;re going to have to come up with some newer, more shiny ways to &#8220;micro-blog&#8221; if they want to stay relevant. The social networking world moves quick, and most folks get bored fast. Hopefully they are planning some new stuff. Otherwise I&#8217;m afraid they will be retired to the &#8220;hey- remember TWITTER?&#8221; category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

