<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Strategic Blend &#187; Gerd Leonhard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.strategicblend.com/tag/gerd-leonhard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.strategicblend.com</link>
	<description>an interactive firm specializing in online advertising, community development, brand identity, website design and production</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 02:46:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>No one likes to get PUSHED around.</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicblend.com/no-one-likes-to-get-pushed-around/</link>
		<comments>http://www.strategicblend.com/no-one-likes-to-get-pushed-around/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sloane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email blasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerd Leonhard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[push vs pull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicblend.com/?p=913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the majority of my professional life I’ve been signing up for email lists. Whether it be when I make a purchase, or become a fan of a new band…. These email lists were once the “lifeblood” of a brand’s online marketing strategy. The more email addresses you had, the more people you could push [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.strategicblend.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/tug-o-war.gif" rel="lightbox[913]"><img class="size-medium wp-image-915 alignnone" title="tug-o-war" src="http://www.strategicblend.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/tug-o-war-300x107.gif" alt="" width="300" height="107" /></a></p>
<p>For the majority of my professional life I’ve been signing up for email lists.  Whether it be when I make a purchase, or become a fan of a new band…. These email lists were once the “lifeblood” of a brand’s online marketing strategy.  The more email addresses you had, the more people you could <strong>push</strong> to react to your news.</p>
<p>A great deal of brands are still utilizing a <strong>push </strong>technology to reach their fans/customers.  Someone must have failed to mention the bottom dropped out on email open rates in <a href="http://www.bizreport.com/2008/03/report_email_open_rates_drop_end_07.html" target="_blank">2007</a>.   Globally email open rates are now somewhere in the <a href="http://www.aweber.com/blog/case-studies/email-newsletter-open-rates-april-2008.htm" target="_blank">10-15% range</a>.  However, the technology is still pushed by many major digital marketing companies as the <strong>lone</strong> way to get your message to the masses.</p>
<p>I may be in a small majority, but I’ve never liked the “email update”.  It’s intrusive, I can’t distinguish “I have something to say” with “here’s another lame J-Crew coupon”…. and I’ve certainly gotten to the point where I open and incredibly slim percentage of what is sent my way (around 30 per day).</p>
<p>My question at this stage in the game is <strong>why continue </strong>to use the same method when that method is proving ineffective?  One of my favorite quotes from Gerd Leonhard is “I program my media, my media does not program me”.  We don’t need to use a giant email gun to broadcast our message any longer.   We need our brand and our content to be “sticky”, meaning that they <strong>want </strong>to come back for more.  Thus, creating a funnel to get them <strong>to </strong>our information, they have to be willing to come back to your brand.  (<a href="http://www.mediafuturist.com/2009/02/most-media-advertising-marketing-is-switching-from-push-to-pull-short-video.html">Check out Gerd on this one</a>)</p>
<p>Should you not begin to consider a PULL methodology?  Should you not wish for your content to be so good that people are <strong>compelled</strong> to come back?  If you’re still wanting some form of push, utilize Syndication via <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSS_(file_format)">RSS feeds</a> &#8211; it will still deliver the same message, but to those who WANT the information.  It will also allow users to <strong>find </strong>your information and <strong>learn </strong>about the history of your content.</p>
<p>In contrast, <strong>push</strong>ing emails puts a limit on those that can read your message.  It’s going to <strong>only </strong>be the number that are signed up for the list. Pulling, in contrast, opens your message up to everyone, and (by utilizing RSS) allows them to subscribe.</p>
<p>Most importantly the subscription is <strong>their choice</strong>, not because they forgot to click a checked box on a form.</p>
<p>If your message is worth reading, they will come&#8230;. if you build it (and build it right)&#8230; they <strong>will</strong> come!</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.strategicblend.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/fod.jpg" rel="lightbox[913]"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-914" title="fod" src="http://www.strategicblend.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/fod.jpg" alt="" width="499" height="229" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.strategicblend.com/no-one-likes-to-get-pushed-around/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube&#8230; oh no you didn&#8217;t!</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicblend.com/youtube-oh-no-you-didnt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.strategicblend.com/youtube-oh-no-you-didnt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sloane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerd Leonhard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicblend.com/?p=773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have heard that Google owned YouTube is now muting unlicensed audio tracks in user uploaded videos (see an example here).  I can almost understand a static image with a song being broadcast in the background (ALMOST&#8230; but not really), what happens with this is taken a step further and the &#8220;backing tracks&#8221; are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have heard that <strong>Google owned YouTube </strong>is now <strong><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mediafuturist/~3/511786015/youtube-now-mutes-videos-with-unauthorized-copyrighted-music.html">muting</a></strong> unlicensed audio tracks in user uploaded videos (see an example <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGix5nV6DQw">here</a>).  I can <strong>almost</strong> understand a static image with a song being broadcast in the background (<strong>ALMOST&#8230; but not really</strong>), what happens with this is taken a step further and the &#8220;backing tracks&#8221; are muted (thus muting the content of the video itself).  This would mean anyone using a song <strong>not</strong> in public domain would have a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoKbDNY0Zwg">Charlie Chaplin</a> film on their hands (minus the stellar story line <a href="http://www.oldroads.org/images2007/nanook4.jpg" rel="lightbox[773]">narration frames</a>), this will kill the creative exploits of a good 10 million or so videos.</p>
<p>This begs the question, how far will the music industry push to be compensated by digitally streaming content?&#8230; and more importantly, how long until all these users flee YouTube and move to <a href="www.vimeo.com">Vimeo</a> or any other free video hosting service?</p>
<p>So, the music industry is shutting down yet another <strong>vehicle of free promotion</strong>… One would think they had learned their lesson by now.  The floodgates have opened and people will find a way to broadcast whatever content they choose.</p>
<p>Once I purchase the song, should I not have the right to <strong>manipulate it in whatever form I choose?</strong> If that manipulation includes using at the backing track to my family vacation, I somehow don&#8217;t see how I&#8217;m exploiting the artist, record company, or anyone else for that matter.</p>
<p>Just maybe I choose a song that no one I know has ever heard of, and they end up <strong>loving</strong> it and buying the album, or entire catalog&#8230; wouldn&#8217;t this be good for the industry as a whole?</p>
<p>Wouldn’t the better solution be to find ways to hook in to free marketing and <strong>utilize</strong> the technological vehicle than shut it down?</p>
<p>Discuss below…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.strategicblend.com/youtube-oh-no-you-didnt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Participate, Stay up to date</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicblend.com/participate-stay-up-to-date/</link>
		<comments>http://www.strategicblend.com/participate-stay-up-to-date/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sloane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Brogan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital personality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerd Leonhard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last.fm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pandora]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicblend.com/?p=626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As with many of you, I continue to form my thoughts on the new paradigm of the internet, and more specifically, the music business. The two entities (technology and music) have been battling one another the better part of my professional career. Technology has brought the discovery of new music into every home, it’s as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with many of you, I continue to form my thoughts on the new paradigm of the internet, and more specifically, the music business.   The two entities (technology and music) have been battling one another the better part of my professional career.  Technology has brought the discovery of new music into every home, it’s as easy as the click of a button on <a href="http://www.pandora.com">Pandora</a>, <a href="http://last.fm">last.fm</a>, and <a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/tag/music-discovery/">many others</a>.  While this is exciting for undiscovered artists, it can’t be the ONLY piece of the puzzle.  Being discovered by a new fan is one thing, monetizing that relationship is much more complex.</p>
<p>How does your personality translate digitally?</p>
<p>You may be one of millions of great songwriters, musicians, or entertainers, but what is setting you apart?  One of the great ways to distinguish your personality “online” is to blog…. just like I’m doing now.  You’re end result is to create a perceived relationship with your reader.  Hopefully there are those out there that can relate to you and what you write.  People that can “feel your pain” or agree with you theories.</p>
<p>I’ve found two wonderful bloggers that I follow regularly because of their position and theory on technology and its implementation in the way I do business, and I think it is applicable here.  When developing your digital identity, use these guys as guideposts.</p>
<p>The first is <a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com">Chris Brogan</a> and specifically, his blog on <a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/40-ways-to-deliver-killer-blog-content/#">HOW to write a compelling blog</a>.  The second is Gerd Leonhard, the author of <a href="http://www.music20book.com">Music 2.0</a>, and perpetual thinker on how technology is affecting the music industry.  I’d direct you to a specific entry, but you’re better suited just adding him to your <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Mediafuturist">RSS feed</a>.  On the subject of inventing yourself to the digital community, <a href="http://www.mediafuturist.com/2008/12/10-quick-ways-t.html">check this out</a>.</p>
<p>It’s all about participation in what your fans  and customers are talking about.  Be heard, have a voice, and lead rather than follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.strategicblend.com/participate-stay-up-to-date/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

