Gigaom has a fantastic post about the use of the word “beta” (click here to read that story). This really hit home with me as I have been ranting for 3 years on how the term is over-used and ill-defined. The same is true for many terms in the tech/media/entertainment world – many used in the launch of new projects or websites.
I’m a firm believer that in today’s hyper-competitive marketplace, we need clearer, more definitive marketing and branding. Using a crazy baby-name for your company (Mebo, Tada, Yoku) doesn’t tell ANYONE what your company does. Saying your project is in “beta” is just another way to say “We’re lazy and didn’t get the full project out in time.” The words “new paradigm,” “web 2.0″ and “new model” are meaningless to regular people and only speak to an industry-based audience.
Now, I realize a brand name is merely a word – the stuff BEHIND the name is what defines a brand. However, this rule goes by the wayside when EVERYONE is using the same crazy terms without any regard to what they really mean. This confuses the casual consumer – the person you ultimately want invested in your business.
If you truly want to stick in the conscious of the consumer, you need branding and messaging that is honest and straight forward. Avoid hype-driven nonsense. If the majority of new start-ups are doing it, chances are you’re better off avoiding it and finding traits and terms that arise organically from within your organization. I recommend conducting early focus groups with potential consumers and let THEM define your brand message.
And for the record…this post is most certainly NOT in “beta.”
Very true point.
When a company goes with a name like ‘flickr’ it makes a little since as it has a direct relation to the service they provide, but when you have a name like ‘meebo’ you are basically cutting off your ability to connect to anyone outside of a small demographic – the tech-savy who have nothing better to do than look for new tech companies. You will never receive mass market appeal (though to be fair, it may not be their goal to appeal to the mass market).
On a similar note… Have you noticed gmail is still in Beta?
Seriously, how long has it been around now? Five years? …and it is STILL in beta? I think at this point it is a little ridiculous.
Gmail is still in Beta because Google keeps making changes, tweaks, modifications etc. If they were to finalize it, they would see the same negative feedback that Facebook gets when they make changes. If your FREE product is still in Beta, you can make as many changes as you want and people can’t complain.
I don’t necessarilly agree with everything you’ve written here, but it was still an interesting and actually quite enlightening read. Cheers.